As we bid
farewell to 2012, its time for an in-depth analysis of Athletics in Kenya for
the year. It has been another fantastic year in terms of performances from the
athletes who enabled Kenya sustain its good name as one of the top Athletics
nations in the world. However, it’s also important to have a critical look at
the decisions, policies and events that helped shape the athletics year.
So here’s my
perspective on the positive and negative aspects of the athletics year.
One of the
best things to happen this year was the Government’s initiative to reward medal
winning athletes with significant cash prizes. It was a tremendous pat on the
back for the winners and a motivational tool for future winners.
The highlight of the year was David Rudisha breaking the world record and winning gold in the London Olympics in what was regarded as the performance of the Games.
Elite and
upcoming athletes benefited from a major workshop to educate them on the
importance of financial planning and media training and to help them deal with
the challenges of professional athletics.
Major
sponsorships for local athletics events by local conglomerates were much
appreciated. However, more sponsorships and promotions were needed to market
many of the athletics events, as there were tremendous opportunities in
supporting events in which some of the best athletes in the world are vying for
spots for major championships.
Having said
that, there were many other events organized by athletes both past and present,
individuals and corporations to raise awareness for different causes that were
enthusiastically supported by local sponsors. Some examples of this included
the Standard Chartered Marathon, the Tecla Loroupe Peace Run, and the Lewa
Marathon.
However, the biggest disappointment was the performance of Kenya's athletes at the London Olympics. Coming from a high in Daegu in 2011, Many had high expectations for Kenya to replicate its success at the highest level but disappointingly left London with only 2 Gold.
AK’s policy
to issue invitations to only top athletes to the trials was discouraging the
development of young athletes looking to break into the elite ranks.
The policy
to select the first 2 automatically and the third by committee, has brought
about many suspicions and frustrations.
Case in point, AK's new thinking of taking 15 10,000 meters athletes for selection at the Prefontaine Classic in Oregon didn't produce any results at the London Olympics. Furthermore that mini trials locked out new and upcoming athletes from trying their luck at making the team.
Other
weaknesses were the lack of technical expertise availed to athletes and coaches
in the sprints and field events. There was also a deficiency of developmental
programs to nurture talent of young sprinters.
Despite
all the weaknesses, the future of Kenyan athletics looks bright and I am
looking forward to another exciting year with a new set of challenges.
Best
wishes for the New Year!